<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/</link>
	<description>Technology and Mac geekery. One part exuberance, two parts obsession.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hutcherson</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-144651</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hutcherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-144651</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else worry that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else worry that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134541</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134541</guid>
		<description>The square BGA chip there, the one with the Apple logo on it, is the ARM processor.  Ten to one, it&#039;s the same CPU used in the high end model.  So, yes, swapping the boards would be easier, but if someone were to go the flash desoldering route, they probably wouldn&#039;t have to replace the CPU as well.  Swapping BGA chips requires tools usually beyond the reach of even the most hardcore DIY-ers.  In any case, the required parts are currently too expensive to attempt this and make it worth investing time and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The square BGA chip there, the one with the Apple logo on it, is the ARM processor.  Ten to one, it&#8217;s the same CPU used in the high end model.  So, yes, swapping the boards would be easier, but if someone were to go the flash desoldering route, they probably wouldn&#8217;t have to replace the CPU as well.  Swapping BGA chips requires tools usually beyond the reach of even the most hardcore DIY-ers.  In any case, the required parts are currently too expensive to attempt this and make it worth investing time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolly</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134520</link>
		<dc:creator>dolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134520</guid>
		<description>swapping the board completely seems simpler but wouldn&#039;t you need the rest of the components that are connected to the board as well such as the arm chip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swapping the board completely seems simpler but wouldn&#8217;t you need the rest of the components that are connected to the board as well such as the arm chip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134464</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134464</guid>
		<description>Possibly after I get one :-)  It looks tedious, though...  The iPod Touch&#039;s persistent data is stored on Flash, which is soldered to one of the daughter cards inside the device:

&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.command-tab.com/images/ipods/ipod_touch_flash_upgrade.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;iPod Touch Flash Memory&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;
(credit to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/09/15/ipod_touch_tear_down_with_high_quality_internal_photos.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AppleInsider&lt;/a&gt; for the photo)

Those two Toshiba TSOP TH58NVG5D4CTG20 chips are 32 Gigabit (4 GigaBytes) each, making up the 8 GB in the entry level Touch model.  I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s possible to desolder those chips and replace them with higher capacity ones, but it&#039;s a serious soldering project not for the faint of heart.  It would be much, much easier just to swap that entire board out with a newer one, if all the connectors still mate.

It looks do-able, but I&#039;ll likely do far more software hacking than hardware, given the dense arrangement of components inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly after I get one :-)  It looks tedious, though&#8230;  The iPod Touch&#8217;s persistent data is stored on Flash, which is soldered to one of the daughter cards inside the device:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.command-tab.com/images/ipods/ipod_touch_flash_upgrade.jpg" alt="iPod Touch Flash Memory" /></center><br />
(credit to <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/09/15/ipod_touch_tear_down_with_high_quality_internal_photos.html" rel="nofollow">AppleInsider</a> for the photo)</p>
<p>Those two Toshiba TSOP TH58NVG5D4CTG20 chips are 32 Gigabit (4 GigaBytes) each, making up the 8 GB in the entry level Touch model.  I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s possible to desolder those chips and replace them with higher capacity ones, but it&#8217;s a serious soldering project not for the faint of heart.  It would be much, much easier just to swap that entire board out with a newer one, if all the connectors still mate.</p>
<p>It looks do-able, but I&#8217;ll likely do far more software hacking than hardware, given the dense arrangement of components inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134459</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134459</guid>
		<description>Any idea when you might do a tutorial on upgrading a Touch&#039;s hard drive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea when you might do a tutorial on upgrading a Touch&#8217;s hard drive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134323</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134323</guid>
		<description>Their wording &quot;5-30v&quot; should mean &quot;anywhere from 5 to 30 volts&quot;, as these devices almost always have some sort of power regulation to take whatever is in that range and make it into what the circuitry needs.  I&#039;ve give it a shot, but you may want to ask Apple support or check another place (forums?) before trying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their wording &#8220;5-30v&#8221; should mean &#8220;anywhere from 5 to 30 volts&#8221;, as these devices almost always have some sort of power regulation to take whatever is in that range and make it into what the circuitry needs.  I&#8217;ve give it a shot, but you may want to ask Apple support or check another place (forums?) before trying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanScott</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-134305</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanScott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-134305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a second-generation 20gig iPod for three years.  I ALWAYS charged it with a 2004 model Apple wall charger, Model A1070, which has marked output of &quot;13 v == 0.62 A.&quot;  That second-generation iPod started getting glitchy, so I just bought a new 80 gig iPod Classic.  Can I use the A1070 old wall charger with the Classic?  The plug fits into the new iPod&#039;s dock connector just fine, but I am afraid to plug the charger into the wall unless I am sure it is compatible.  My new iPod Classic 80 gig is stamped at the dock connector &quot;Rated 5-30 v == 1 A max.&quot; I don&#039;t know if that means &quot;5.3 volts&quot; (the output of a USB port, right?), or a permissible range of 5 to 30 volts.  Mainly, I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s safe to plug the 13-volt Apple wall charger into the Classic.  Can somebody give me some guidance on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a second-generation 20gig iPod for three years.  I ALWAYS charged it with a 2004 model Apple wall charger, Model A1070, which has marked output of &#8220;13 v == 0.62 A.&#8221;  That second-generation iPod started getting glitchy, so I just bought a new 80 gig iPod Classic.  Can I use the A1070 old wall charger with the Classic?  The plug fits into the new iPod&#8217;s dock connector just fine, but I am afraid to plug the charger into the wall unless I am sure it is compatible.  My new iPod Classic 80 gig is stamped at the dock connector &#8220;Rated 5-30 v == 1 A max.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know if that means &#8220;5.3 volts&#8221; (the output of a USB port, right?), or a permissible range of 5 to 30 volts.  Mainly, I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s safe to plug the 13-volt Apple wall charger into the Classic.  Can somebody give me some guidance on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MangoTru7h</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-129094</link>
		<dc:creator>MangoTru7h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-129094</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also really interested in the iPod touch.  I really want to see what it can do.  If it has a voice notes feature like previous ipods (mic in) its possible to get voice chat, or Skype to run on it.  sounds fun.


I am disappointed that it looks like apple decided to disable the feature to add calendar events and contacts via the multi-touch keyboard.

Then again, thats why I&#039;ll be watching the hacking community, iPod Touch and iPhone seem to run the same binaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also really interested in the iPod touch.  I really want to see what it can do.  If it has a voice notes feature like previous ipods (mic in) its possible to get voice chat, or Skype to run on it.  sounds fun.</p>
<p>I am disappointed that it looks like apple decided to disable the feature to add calendar events and contacts via the multi-touch keyboard.</p>
<p>Then again, thats why I&#8217;ll be watching the hacking community, iPod Touch and iPhone seem to run the same binaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-129004</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-129004</guid>
		<description>Do you think something like what was done with the ipod super could be done with this to include a hdd in order to tap into the touch feature, but then also allow significant storage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think something like what was done with the ipod super could be done with this to include a hdd in order to tap into the touch feature, but then also allow significant storage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-128844</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.command-tab.com/2007/09/05/ipod-touch/#comment-128844</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m excited, but not about the capacity. Think something like the iPod Super is possible, leaving the flash memory in as a base and building on that with a toshiba hdd and a case mod?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited, but not about the capacity. Think something like the iPod Super is possible, leaving the flash memory in as a base and building on that with a toshiba hdd and a case mod?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

